知识产权制度功能的重读与澄清——对“鼓励创造说”的检讨与批判

    Reinterpretations and Clarification on Institutional Functions of Intellectual Property

    • 摘要: 知识产权能够鼓励创造系知识产权制度功能的通常解说,该说法及其依据的历史素材之间存在循环论证的嫌疑。事实上,经由不同价值导向进行的历史阐释呈现出更加丰富的知识产权制度发展历程,揭示出鼓励创造说极有可能是一种倒果为因的立法策略。横向比较古代中国知识产权制度萌芽及受阻的过程,将发现强大的利益诉求与社会认可而非鼓励创造的期待是形成知识产权制度的重要原因,进而澄清制度功能并非价值诠释,而是事实描述这一基本问题。知识产权最重要的制度功能在于为作品、发明、商标这些信息提供市场化的制度环境,在不同的社会主体之间分配基于这些信息产生的利益。

       

      Abstract: Intellectual property can encourage innovation is the usually explanation about the institutional functions of intellectual property,but there is a suspicion of circular argument between this statement and the related historical facts. In fact,the historical interpretation by different value orientation showing more abundant development history about intellectual property system,reveals that the theory of encouraging innovation is likely a legislative strategy which takes effect as cause. Through the comparison on the history of enlightenment and development about intellectual property in the society of ancient China,will find interest demand and social recognition,rather than the expectations for encouraging innovation,are most important reasons for the formation of intellectual property system,and then clarify the basic problem that institutional function of intellectual property is not value interpretation,but factual description. In the end,Clarifying the most important function of intellectual property system is:to provide market-oriented institutional environment for the works,inventions,trademarks and other information and distribute interest which generated from the information among different social subjects.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map