“双碳”政策的知识图谱、研究热点与理论框架

    Knowledge Mapping, Research Hotspots and Theoretical Framework of “Dual-carbon” Policy

    • 摘要: 采用三轮文献筛选和专家遴选,对402篇(中文)和2 837篇(英文)“双碳”政策核心期刊文献进行文献计量可视化与内容分析。结果显示,“双碳”政策路径主要包括能源清洁化转型、产业绿色化升级、碳交易市场、生态环保与碳汇四个方面。除此之外,社会正义、法律体系、氢能、储能和CCUS也是“双碳”政策的研究热点。基于“双碳”政策路径的生成逻辑,建构了一个整合“政策机制—政策类型—政策路径”的理论框架,廓析了“双碳”政策的要素结构、互动机制和内在逻辑。其中,政策机制旨在澄明因何以及如何制定和执行“双碳”政策体系,包括政策主体、情境、目标和规则四个要素;而政策类型则是政策机制作用下的结果,包括制度规制、市场机制和技术创新,厘清政策类型有助于为“双碳”政策的具体路径提供方向指引;有鉴于此,政策路径即为不同政策类型下的“双碳”政策执行的具体行动方向,包括能源转型、产业升级、碳交易市场、生态碳汇、人工固碳。研究有助于丰富“双碳”政策科学的理论研究,为系统地把握“双碳”政策的理论脉络和发展进路,以及后续的政策制定、执行与优化提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Using three rounds of literature screening and expert selection, a bibliometric visualization and content analysis of 402 (in Chinese) and 2837 (in English) core journal articles on “dual-carbon” policies was conducted. The results show that the policy path of “dual-carbon” mainly includes four aspects: cleaner energy transition, greener industry upgrading, carbon trading market and ecological protection and carbon sinks. In addition, social justice, legal system, hydrogen energy, energy storage and CCUS are also research hot spots of “dual-carbon” policies. On this basis, a theoretical framework integrating “policy mechanism—policy type —policy path” was constructed to clarify the elemental structure, interaction mechanism and internal logic of “dual-carbon” policies. Among them, policy mechanism aims to clarify why and how to formulate and implement the “dual-carbon” policy system, including four elements: policy actors, situations, objectives and rules. Policy types are the results of policy mechanism, including institutional regulation, market mechanisms and technological innovation, and clarifying policy types can help provide direction for the specific path of “dual-carbon” policy. In light of this, policy path is the specific action direction of “dual-carbon” policy implementation under different policy types, including energy transformation, industrial upgrading, carbon trading market, ecological carbon sink, and artificial carbon sequestration. This study enriches the theoretical research on “dual-carbon” policy science, and helps policy makers to understand and grasp the theoretical framework and development path of “dual-carbon” policy in a systematic way, and provides theoretical and practical reference for subsequent policy formulation, implementation and optimization.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map