格兰特在琉球“分岛”方案中之作用考论

    Grant’s Role in “Island Division” Dispute for Lew Chew Question

    • 摘要: 日本在明治维新后便迅速走上对外扩张的道路,在其对外侵略过程中,琉球因地缘等因素成为其首个目标。琉球作为中国的藩属,其臣子在危急存亡之秋,不得不寻求中国清政府的帮助以抵抗日本侵略。清政府处理此事的主要方针便是在外交上积极地寻求各列强的帮助,在李鸿章等人的请求下美国前总统格兰特成为了琉球纠纷的调解人。中日双方历经数年不断地谈判,最终日本拿出了一份所谓的“分岛条约”,但是对于这份方案到底源于清政府、日本内阁还是格兰特,以及格兰特是否直接插手于“分岛条约”之中,学界对此还尚存争议。格兰特提出“互让”之精神不假,但实际的条约拟定以及最终实施方案的敲定,应是在日本内阁的推动下实现,最终以清政府拒绝签约且琉球被日本全部侵占而结束。因此,格兰特在琉球纷争中的作用便是给予中日双方谈判与缓和的余地,并且根据西方先前的类似案例,给出了一个相互折衷的谈判思路——“格兰特精神”,其并未直接介入到“分岛条约”的制定工作当中。这样看格兰特在此事件当中的作用或更为客观与清晰。

       

      Abstract: After the Meiji Restoration, Japan quickly embarked on a path of external expansion. During its aggression, Lew Chew became its first target due to geographical factors. As a vassal of China, Lew Chew’s minister had to seek help from the Qing government to resist Japanese aggression during the critical time. The main policy of the Qing government in handling this issue was to actively seek the help of various powers in diplomacy. At the request of Li Hongzhang and others, former US President Grant became the mediator of the Lew Chew dispute. After years of continuous negotiations between China and Japan, Japan finally came up with a so-called “Island Division Treaty”. However, there is still controversy over whether this plan originated from the Qing government, the Japanese cabinet, or Grant, and whether Grant directly intervened in the “Island Separation Treaty” in the academic community. Although Grant did put forward the spirit of “mutual concessions”, but the actual treaty formulation and final implementation plan should have been achieved with the promotion of the Japanese cabinet, ultimately ending with the Qing government’ refusal to sign it and Lew Chew being fully occupied by Japan. Therefore, Grant’s role in the Ryukyu dispute was to provide room for negotiation and ease between China and Japan, and based on similar cases in the West, he proposed a mutually compromised negotiation according to the “Grant Spirit”, which did not directly intervene in the formulation of the “Island Division Treaty”. Seen from this perspective, Grant’s role in this event may be more objective and clearer.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map