轻罪治理的经验与逻辑以《关于办理醉酒危险驾驶刑事案件的意见》为例

    Experience and Logic of Misdemeanor GovernanceTaking the Opinions of Handling Criminal Cases of Dangerous Driving While Intoxicated as an Example

    • 摘要: 中国轻罪治理贯彻治罪与治理并重理念,在探索立法定性司法定量治罪策略的基础上,以快速办理为主要导向,初步形成附条件出罪规则和“出罪入行”机制,具有积极意义。但轻罪治理是一项系统工程,中国轻罪治理整体上存在政策有余而制度不足、惩罚有余而矫正不足、从快有余而从慢不足、对抗有余而协商不足、配合有余而制约不足等缺陷。提升中国轻罪治理效能,应在完善犯罪分层制度的基础上,通过建立轻罪附条件出罪制度、完善轻罪司法慢处理机制、降低轻罪强制措施适用率、建立轻微犯罪记录封存制度、完善轻罪处理制约机制等方式,将政策优势转化为制度优势。

       

      Abstract: The governance of misdemeanors in China adheres to the concept of placing equal emphasis on both crime punishment and management. Based on legal qualification and judicial quantification, primarily focusing on rapid case handling and preliminarily establishing conditional decriminalization rules and a mechanism that transfers less harmful illegal acts from criminal to administrative penalties is of positive significance. However, misdemeanor governance is a systematic project. Overall, there are deficiencies in China's misdemeanor governance, such as an excess of policies but insufficient systems, an excess of punishment but insufficient correction, an excess of speed but insufficient slowness, an excess of confrontation but insufficient negotiation, and an excess of cooperation but insufficient restraint. To enhance the efficacy of misdemeanor governance and transform policy advantages into institutional strengths, the crime stratification system should be refined as a foundation and the following measures should be taken: establish a system for conditional exemption of misdemeanors, perfect the judicial slow processing mechanism for misdemeanors, reduce the application rate of coercive measures for misdemeanors, establish an institution for sealing records of misdemeanors, and perfect the restraint mechanism for handling misdemeanors.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map