过错主义在婚约财产纠纷领域的司法适用以《彩礼返还规定》第6条为视角

    Judicial Application of the Fault Doctrine in Disputes over Property in Betrothal Contracts: From the Perspective of Article 6 of the “Provisions on Betrothal Gifts Return”

    • 摘要: 2024年施行的《关于审理涉彩礼纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》明确彩礼返还过错主义,旨在加强对彩礼返还纠纷中无过错妇女的司法保护。通过整理涉过错事实的婚约财产之诉案件,显现妇女主张的过错事实抗辩未经类型化、过错主张难以得到法官认定及过错判决存在偏差等问题,在该规定适用前后均广泛存在。彩礼制度在立法上存在法律缺位及既有规范可操作性不强,在司法上存在法官对彩礼返还与婚约纠纷中的妇女权益保护的认识不同。在完善相关立法的基础上,应明确过错事实与妇女权益损害在审判实践中的关联性,落实妇女权益相关法律的立法精神,以加强妇女权益在婚约关系中的司法保护。

       

      Abstract: The “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Betrothal Gift Disputes”, which came into effect in 2024, clarifies a doctrine of fault of betrothal gifts return, enhancing judicial protection for faultless women in disputes over betrothal gifts from the perspective of women’s rights and interests protection. By screening and summarizing cases regarding fault in engagement property disputes, it becomes evident that the defense of fault claimed by women has not been classified effectively, judges find it difficult to distinguish the accusation of fault, and there are discrepancies in fault judicial sentencing. These issues have been widespread both before and after the application of the new provisions. This reveals the absence of legislation and the lack of practical operation in current legal norms regarding betrothal gifts return rules, as well as varying awareness of the protection of women’s rights and interests in betrothal gifts return and engagement disputes among judges. The correlation between fault facts and indemnities should be clarified, the legislative spirit of laws pertaining to women’s rights and interests should be fully implemented, and legal protection of women’s rights and interests in an engagement should be strengthened through the perfection of relevant legislation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map