对我国民法典中应否设定第三类民事主体的思考

    A Proposal of the Establishment of the Third Genus of Civil Body in Chinese Civil Law

    • 摘要: 民法典中应否设立第三类民事主体,立法和理论研究中都存在不同的观点。本文主要观点:一是设立第三类民事主体是有意义的,它可以弥补一些特殊主体因法律没有明确规定其人格地位而形成的主体缺位漏洞,使法律关系难以调整的问题得到解决;二是应纠正现有民法主体理论中存在对权利能力认识的错误,消除“主体间权利能力不平等”的理论悖论;三是应通过立法解决因设立第三类民事主体而引起的矛盾。

       

      Abstract: There are, legally and theoretically, some different viewpoints upon the establishment of the Third Genus of Civil Body in Chinese Civil Law. The main points of this paper are as follows: first, it is significant to establish the third civil body which can be expected to fetch up the imperfection of the main body of the civil law owing to the obscurity of the personality status and solve the difficult problems that are hard to handle legally; secondly, it is necessary to rectify the erring understanding of the power capacity in the theory of civil law, and clear up the theoretical antinomies of the power capacity inequality of the main bodies; thirdly, it is necessary to legally work out the contradictions caused by the establishment of the third main body.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map