马克思在异化问题上思想转变的实质——评张奎良与俞吾金的争论
The Essentiality of Marx's Conversion on the Problem of Alienation——Debates between Zhang Kuiliang and Yu wujin
-
摘要: 马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的异化概念既指矛盾对立关系,又指先验本质的外化。作为矛盾对立关系的异化,成熟时期的马克思沿用了它;作为先验本质外化的异化,其逻辑功用是借助黑格尔倒立着的发展观来摆脱理论困境的表现,成熟时期的马克思抛弃了它。马克思异化理论的前后差别在于扬弃异化关系的道路不同:早期是借用先验本质外化的逻辑,成熟时期是从生产方式的变革来论证异化的扬弃;认为马克思早期对异化进行的是“道德评价,”而成熟时期对异化进行的是“历史评价,”这种说法有失偏颇。Abstract: The notion of alienation in Karl Marx's Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 refers to a contradictory relation and the externalization of transcendental essence.Marx at a mature stage used alienation as a term indicating a contradictory relation.Alienation as a term indicating the externalization of transcendental essence,whose logical function is to break away from the theoretical crisis with the help of Hegelian reversed outlook,is abandoned by Marx at a mature stage.Marx's conversion with regard to the concept of alienation lies in his realization of the full capacity of the term.A young Marx emphasizes the logic of the externalization of transcendental essence,while a mature Marx reexamines alienation from the perspective of the revolution of production mode.The view that in relation to alienation a morality evaluation applies to a young Marx and a history evaluation applies to a mature Marx remains contestable.
下载: