由意识形态对历史的遮蔽到马克思分工理论对历史的解蔽

    From History Obscured by Ideology to History Exposed by Marxist Theory of Labor Division

    • 摘要: 在历史问题上,黑格尔和费尔巴哈分别作为唯心主义和形而上学唯物主义的典型代表,由于黑格尔的综合与费尔巴哈的形而上学和直观方法脱离实践,在历史问题上均落入了意识形态陷阱,不自觉的作了历史的辩护士。马克思以分工为线索解蔽了历史之谜,把人类发展史的嬗变与作为人类外化劳动的直观展现形式的分工相联系,透过为黑格尔和费尔巴哈所鄙视的工商业实践这一现实的分工活动,揭示了资本与劳动的对立和矛盾运动,展现了人类主体自身的分裂。马克思以分工为契机敢于直面历史的疮痍与丑恶,并努力在批判中开启人类的解放之路。

       

      Abstract: Upon the question of history, Hegel and Feuerbach were typical of idealism and metaphysical materialism respectively. Because Hegel’s integration and Feuerbach’s metaphysics and intuitive way were alienated from practice, they all fell into the ideological trap on historical problem and became historical apologists unconsciously. Marx uncovered the mystery by the clue of division of labor, associated with the evolution of history of human development and the division of work which displayed visually as human’s outside work form as human, through the realistic division of labor activity in business which both Hegel and Feuerbach distained, revealed the contradiction and antithetic relation between capital and labor, showed the human subject's own division. Marx bravely confronted the wound and the ugliness of history from the perspective of the division of labor, and tried to open the critical path of human liberation in criticism.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map