“双反调查”的法律和案例分析及其启示

    Legal and Case Analysis of AD/CVD Investigations and its Impact on China

    • 摘要: 随着中国在世界贸易体制中作用的日益重要,美国和欧盟等贸易体改变了以往不对非市场经济国家采取反补贴调查的习惯做法,对中国产品征收了反倾销税和反补贴税,中国也相应对外国产品进行“双反调查”。通过对近期案例的分析,争议点集中在国内补贴是否降低了产品价格的问题上。即便中国在WTO败诉,仍然可以通过由调查机构证明不存在双重计算的举证责任分配方式来维护自身的利益。

       

      Abstract: Since China is now a rising power in world trading system. United States and EU have changed their customary practices,which do not take countervailing investigations against NME countries. Instead,they levy AD Duties and CVD Duties on China products. As countermeasures,China also takes AD/CVD investigations. Having made thorough analysis,we may conclude that the critical points focused on whether domestic subsidies lower prices. Even if China is defeated in WTO dispute settlement proceedings,we may defend our interests by asking investigation body to prove that there is no double-counting in the application of AD/CVD Duties.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map