援子入史的误读与误判——刘知幾《史通》“小说”辨

    Misapprehend and Misjudgement about Utilizing the Novels to Write Historical Books ——Discriminating What is called“Novel”in Liu Zhi-ji’s Shi-Tong

    • 摘要: 编年体与纪传体是刘知幾《史通》中史学系统的正史之体, 正史之余则为非正史, 即用以编撰正史的史料。小说发展至刘知幾时, 仍体现以记言、记事为主要表现形式的特点, 被刘知幾援子入史, 纳入史料范畴。故刘知幾《史通》并无论述小说之本意, 刘知幾小说观念未超越以《隋志》为代表的唐人小说观念。《杂述》篇“偏记小说”10类是刘知幾对其泛史料观念的分类体现, 而并非是小说分类。

       

      Abstract: In Liu Zhi-ji’s Shi-Tong, the annalistic style and biographical style are the orthodox historical styles of history system, and the other, namely the historical materials being used to write orthodox historical books, are non- orthodox historical styles. Until Liu Zhi-ji’s time, the novels still take recording saying and matters as their main characteristics. And consequently, Liu Zhi-ji could make use of them to write historical books and regard them as historical materials. So Liu Zhi-ji didn’t have intention to discourse upon novels, and meanwhile, his concept of novels didn’t go beyond other people in Tang dynasty taking Sui-Zhi as a representative. Ten kinds of partial recording novels in the chapter Mixed Depiction were the classificatory embodiment of Liu Zhi-ji’s concept about pan-historical materials, and weren’t the classification of novels.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map