欧洲法院关于欧盟航空排放交易指令合法性初裁

    ECJ’s Preliminary Ruling on the Validity of the EU Aviation Emission Trading System Directive

    • 摘要: 2011年12月21日, 欧洲法院就美国航空运输协会等诉英国能源和气候变化内务大臣案的初裁请求发表初裁意见。初裁意见解决了两项事项:一是《芝加哥公约》因“权能尚未转移”而对欧盟不具有约束力, 《京都议定书》因条约特征而对欧盟不具有直接效力, 故仅部分国际习惯法规则(国家空气空间主权、国家不得对公海行使主权和公海飞越自由)和《开放天空协议》(第7条、第11(1)条、第11(2)(c)条、第15(3)条)可以用以判定欧盟航空排放交易指令的有效性。二是欧盟航空排放交易指令完全符合上述相关国际法规则。欧洲法院初裁意见意味着我国未来寻求类似司法救济存在诸多障碍和不确定, 积极谋求多边框架下的国际合作和国内航空减排规划将是我国应对欧盟航空排放权交易体制的现实举措。

       

      Abstract: The European Court of Justice(ECJ) released a preliminary ruling made in the proceedings brought by the Air Transport Association v. SS for Energy and Climate Change on 21 December 2011. Broadly speaking, ECJ’s preliminary ruling addressed two questions:first, only certain provisions of the Open Skies Agreement (article 7, article 11(1) and article 11(2)(c), article 15(3))and three principles of customary international law(namely the sovereignty of States over their airspace, the illegitimacy of claims to sovereignty over the high seas and freedom to fly over the high seas)may be relied upon for the purposes of examination of the directive’s validity; second, the European Union Aviation Emissions Trading System Directive is consistent with these international laws. Considering many obstacles and uncertainties inferred by this preliminary ruling for Chinese civil aircraft industry to initiate the similar litigation, Chinese civil aircraft industry should push its government to seek international cooperation and actionable aviation emission reduction schedules to cope with the EU aviation emission trading system.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map