未注册商标私法救济的问题解析与制度完善

    Problem Analysis and Suggestion for Civil Remedy of Unregistered Trademarks

    • 摘要: 在商标法的第三次修改过程中,未注册商标的私法救济问题始终是一个难点,在保护的必要性、理由、实现方式等问题上,一直以来都存在着不同意见。在自愿注册原则下,未注册商标属于未上升为权利的法益,应当受到法律的保护。但是,规范分析发现,扩充解释《商标法》第31条中“在先权利”无法对普通未注册商标提供保护,而《反不正当竞争法》第5条第2款的解释适用也无法对普通未注册商标提供保护。《商标法》的第三次修改应当细分普通未注册商标与注册商标、商号等其他商业标记发生效力冲突的可能情形,明确其在哪种情形下受到保护以及受到何种程度的保护,完善对普通未注册商标的保护规定,充分发挥商标法律制度在市场经济活动中的提升作用。

       

      Abstract: It is difficult to deal with the civil remedy of unregistered trademarks in the third modification of trademark law, and there are different opinions about the necessity, reasons and the realizing way etc. Unregistered trademarks belong to a kind of legal interests that doesn't count as rights and should be protected by law under the voluntary registration principle. However, through the normative analysis we found that the trademark law could give only limited protection to those unregistered trademarks which have been used for a time and made an effect, while the anti-unfair competition law could not protect those trademarks either. During the third modification of the trademark law, we should analyze possible situations about the conflicts of efficacy between unregistered trademarks and registered trademarks or other commercial signs, make it clear whether these trademarks should be protected or not, figure out the ways to carry out protections, and perfect the protection of common unregistered trademarks.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map