Abstract: The debate Zhan Ruoshui Confucianism and Buddhism from "virtual", "static" determination of the analysis of the concept of start, finally the awareness with the heavenly "proposition. Will ‘false or true consubstantiality'and ‘to still have not nothing, did not have the physical view is consistent in its'awareness in the heavenly " proposition of academic thought from the deep and FoLao learning drawn. No matter Zhan Ruoshui explain to the world of Chen xianzhang played to learn the Buddha's deep meditation or or Zhan Ruoshui and WangShouRen of Confucianism and Buddhism, argument or debate is just a symptom, it came out of the reaction is the core issue of Zhan Ruoshui philosophy and the philosophy WangShouRen, Chen xianzhang played in the core level differences and differences: "awareness in the heavenly" and "the Lord static", the relationship between the heavenly conscience is "ready" or "a heart to be read". The differentiation of Confucianism and Buddhism as a kind of carrier, bearing the weight of the Zhan Ruoshui defend traditional moral principles consciousness, carrying Zhan Ruoshui in Ming dynasty for philosophers to thinking about the problems of carrying Zhan Ruoshui legitimate concerns for Confucianism.